How to find missing person in hong kong
There is a specialised missing person unit located in each of the five regional headquarters their contacts are here. They are responsible for investigating, correlating and disseminating all the missing persons reports received by police stations. If you wish to file a missing person report, it will help us if you bring along with you the following information about the missing person :. You may also help our investigation by conducting the following initial actions before making the report:. If you know the whereabouts or can add to the circumstances of a person classified as missing, please notify us through the following channels :.
Missing persons in Hong Kong – human rights law in context
This part is a slightly modified version from the pp. The fundamental basis for the protection of human rights in Hong Kong is the rule of law maintained by an independent judiciary. Where, under the law, an official or an authority has discretion to make a decision, that discretion must be exercised legally, fairly and reasonably. Where it does not do so, the decision must be capable of successful challenge before the courts.
The Basic Law guarantees the right of Hong Kong residents to institute legal proceedings in the courts against the acts of the executive authorities and their personnel; and.
Article 35 also provides that Hong Kong residents shall have the right to institute legal proceedings in the courts against the acts of the executive authorities and their personnel. No government authority or official, and no individual, is above the law. All persons, regardless of race, rank, politics, religion or sex, are equal before the law and subject to the same law.
The Basic Law guarantees a wide range of freedoms and rights, including —. In addition, permanent residents of the HKSAR enjoy the rights to vote and to stand for election in accordance with law.
The rights and freedoms enjoyed by Hong Kong residents shall not be restricted unless as prescribed by law. Such restrictions shall not contravene the provisions of the preceding paragraph of this Article. In general, and as is usual in common law systems, treaties that apply to Hong Kong including human rights treaties do not themselves have the force of law in the domestic legal system of Hong Kong.
They cannot directly be invoked before the courts as the source of individual rights. However, the courts will, when possible, construe domestic legislation in such a way as to avoid incompatibility with international treaties that apply to Hong Kong.
The usual method of giving effect in local law to treaty obligations when these require some change in existing laws or practice is to enact specific new legislation. Where this results in the creation or definition of specific legal rights and where these rights are denied or interfered with or there is the threat of such action , a remedy will be available in the courts through the ordinary procedures of civil litigation; or the law may provide criminal sanctions.
Article of the Basic Law provides that the laws previously in force in Hong Kong shall be adopted as laws of the Region except for those which the Standing Committee of the NPC declares to be in contravention of the Basic Law. In February , the Standing Committee considered that three sections of the BORO relating to the interpretation and application of the Ordinance had an overriding effect over other laws, including the Basic Law.
As such, they contravened the Basic Law and could not be adopted. The non-adoption of these sections has no effect on the protection of human rights in the HKSAR in view of the constitutional guarantee in Article 39 of the Basic Law.
So too are the remedies provided under section 6 for contravention of the Ordinance and the binding effect on the Government and all public authorities under section 7. This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life. This penalty can only be carried out pursuant to a final judgment rendered by a competent court. Amnesty, pardon or commutation of the sentence of death may be granted in all cases.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
It shall not be the general rule that persons awaiting trial shall be detained in custody, but release may be subject to guarantees to appear for trial, at any other stage of the judicial proceedings, and, should occasion arise, for execution of the judgment.
Juvenile offenders shall be segregated from adults and be accorded treatment appropriate to their age and legal status.
No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation. A person who does not have the right of abode in Hong Kong but who is lawfully in Hong Kong may be expelled therefrom only in pursuance of a decision reached in accordance with law and shall, except where compelling reasons of national security otherwise require, be allowed to submit the reasons against his expulsion and to have his case reviewed by, and be represented for the purpose before, the competent authority or a person or persons especially designated by the competent authority.
All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
The press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order ordre public or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgment rendered in a criminal case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the guardianship of children.
Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time when the criminal offence was committed. If, subsequent to the commission of the offence, provision is made by law for the imposition of a lighter penalty, the offender shall benefit thereby. Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary-.
The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order ordre public , the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on members of the armed forces and of the police in their exercise of this right.
In the case of dissolution, provision shall be made for the necessary protection of any children. Every permanent resident shall have the right and the opportunity, without any of the distinctions mentioned in article 1 1 and without unreasonable restrictions-.
All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Persons belonging to ethnic, religious or linguistic minorities shall not be denied the right, in community with the other members of their group, to enjoy their own culture, to profess and practise their own religion, or to use their own language.
Eligible applicants receive legal aid through the provision of the services of a solicitor and a barrister in court proceedings, as necessary, to ensure that any person who has reasonable grounds for pursuing or defending a legal action is not prevented from doing so by lack of means.
Applicants must satisfy the Director of Legal Aid of their financial eligibility the means test and of the justification for legal action the merits test. The grant of legal aid is not subject to a residence requirement. In criminal cases, the Director has discretion to waive the upper limits of the means test if he considers it in the interest of justice to do so.
Subject to the means test unless waived by a judge , it is mandatory to grant legal aid to an applicant charged with murder, treason or piracy with violence. For other offences, provided the applicant passes the means test, a judge may grant legal aid notwithstanding that legal aid has been refused on merits by the Director. This Service complements the legal aid services provided by the Legal Aid Department. It operates three schemes that respectively provide legal representation the Duty Lawyer Scheme , legal advice the Legal Advice Scheme and legal information the Tel Law Scheme.
The Duty Lawyer Scheme offers legal representation to virtually all defendants juvenile and adult charged in the Magistracies who cannot afford private representation. The Legal Advice Scheme and the Tel Law Scheme respectively provide members of the public with free legal advice through individual appointments and taped information on the legal aspects of everyday problems.
The Legal Aid Services Council, an independent statutory body, was established in Its role is to oversee the provision of legal aid services by the Legal Aid Department and advise the Chief Executive on legal aid policy.
Members of the public can complain directly to The Ombudsman, who can also initiate investigations on her own volition and may publish investigation reports of public interest. Additionally, The Ombudsman is empowered to investigate complaints of non-compliance with the Code on Access to Information.
The enactment of The Ombudsman Amendment Ordinance enables the independent status of The Ombudsman and enables her to carry out her functions more effectively. The Ombudsman is entrusted with full autonomy and statutory powers to conduct its own administrative and financial business. The Ordinance also makes it clear that The Ombudsman is not a servant or agent of the Government.
Subject to The Ombudsman Ordinance, The Ombudsman may obtain any information and documents from such persons as she thinks fit. She may summon any person to provide information relating to her investigations and may enter any premises of the organisations under her jurisdiction to conduct investigations.
She also has sufficient means with which to ensure that her recommendations are heard and acted upon. After investigating a complaint, The Ombudsman is empowered to report her opinion and reasons, together with a statement of any remedy and recommendation that is considered necessary, to the head of the organisation affected. If the recommendation is not acted upon within a reasonable timeframe, The Ombudsman may report the matter to the Chief Executive.
She may also do so if she believes that there has been a serious irregularity or injustice done. Such reports are bound by law to be laid before the Legislative Council. Complaints against these two departments are handled by discrete, dedicated bodies see paragraphs 47 and 48 below.
It undertakes research programmes and public education to promote equal opportunities in the community. The Commission is also empowered to issue codes of practice to provide practical guidelines to facilitate public compliance with the laws on equal opportunities.
The Personal Data Privacy Ordinance PDPO provides for statutory control of the collection, holding and use of personal data in both the public and private sectors. Its provisions are based on internationally accepted data protection principles. It applies to personal data to which access is reasonably practicable whether they are in computerised, manual for example, paper file , or audio-visual form. To promote and enforce compliance with its provisions, the Ordinance provides for an independent statutory authority — the Privacy Commissioner for Personal Data — with appropriate powers of investigation and enforcement.
His responsibilities also include promoting awareness and understanding of the Ordinance, publishing codes of practice on how to comply with the Ordinance, and examining proposed legislation that may affect the privacy of individuals in relation to personal data. The IPCC is an independent civilian body comprising non-official members appointed by the Chief Executive from a wide spectrum of the community and include Members of the Legislative Council and the Ombudsman or her representative.
Again, this is an independent committee appointed by the Chief Executive. The Committee comprises mainly of members of the Executive and Legislative Councils and a representative of the Ombudsman.
When the unit has completed its investigation of a complaint, its conclusions and recommendations are submitted to the Committee for consideration. Other disciplined services departments maintain clear guidelines and procedures for handling complaints.
These persons may also direct their complaints to the Ombudsman. The existing complaint channels are considered effective in view of the number and the nature of complaints handled. The Immigration Department applies complaints procedures set out in the Immigration Service Standing Orders made by the Director of Immigration under the authority of the Immigration Service Ordinance. Complaints about abuse of authority or maltreatment by service members can be made to the Director of Immigration and are investigated promptly in accordance with the procedures in the Standing Orders.
To ensure that all complaints are properly handled, a Complaints Review Working Party examines the results of investigations, conduct reviews and recommends follow-up action whenever necessary.
Persons who consider that they have been improperly treated or that their cases have been mismanaged also have access to the Ombudsman. If there is prima facie evidence that a member of the Immigration Service has committed a criminal offence, the Immigration Service will immediately report the matter to the police for further investigation.
Under section 8 of the Immigration Service Ordinance Chapter , unlawful or unnecessary exercise of authority resulting in loss or injury to any person is a disciplinary offence. Normally, when we think of somebody going missing, there is an obvious time frame attached to the event.
As with any change in our environment, we humans tend to react almost immediately as we decide whether the event is positive or not. We might either dial or immediately seek to protect ourselves and our family from harm.
When we realize a loved one has gone missing, though, it is not immediately apparent that they are in danger unless we have reliable information about the circumstances of their disappearance.
Despair and frustration will often accompany each missing person case. Trying to locate a missing person is like trying to find a needle in a haystack, and preliminary investigations often lead nowhere or progress slowly. With the help of our vast experience, elaborate databases and analytical methodology, we possess the resources to achieve critical breakthroughs in such cases. Over the years, we have helped numerous persons reunite with their families.
Gehe zu:. Bereiche dieser Seite. Real Hong Kong News English subtitled video.
Causeway Bay Books disappearances
Make a police report at the nearest police station and obtain a copy of the report. Report your pet missing to the SPCA You can also post information about your missing pet on our Lost and Found Pet website. Post your missing pet on your Facebook page, together with its picture and the location where it went missing. Share with as many friends as possible. Facebook can be one of the most effective ways to find a missing pet, since it alerts pet lovers all over Hong Kong to be on the lookout. Make a poster with images of different angles of your lost pet. Put posters up in appropriate places in the area where you lost your pet. Make sure that you use the most recent photos, preferably showing the collar that your pet was wearing when it went missing. Use clear photos preferably showing all angles of your pet.
The man was travelling by bus on Friday afternoon along the bridge-and-tunnel network linking Hong Kong, Macau and mainland city Zhuhai, his son said. Hong Kong police confirmed receiving a report from the son on Saturday and have opened a missing person case. It does not normally host a checkpoint, but mainland police set one up there last week with X-ray machines and facial-recognition checks ahead of an upcoming visit to Macau by President Xi Jinping. AFP reporters passed through the checkpoint last Wednesday. It was manned by dozens of heavily armed SWAT officers and bus passengers had their luggage, faces and identity documents screened.
Hongkonger ‘missing’ after crossing Chinese checkpoint on mega bridge to Macau
This part is a slightly modified version from the pp. The fundamental basis for the protection of human rights in Hong Kong is the rule of law maintained by an independent judiciary. Where, under the law, an official or an authority has discretion to make a decision, that discretion must be exercised legally, fairly and reasonably.
Tracing missing people, family members, old friends, gone aways, debtors. Our UK People search service covers whole of the United Kingdom, we act on behalf of private, legal and corporate clients. Our Italy People search service covers whole of Italy, we act on behalf of private, legal and corporate clients. Our China People search service covers whole of China, we act on behalf of private, legal and corporate clients. When searching and looking to find people in Hong Kong who are missing or that you have lost touch with, family, friends, or a debtor who owes money, Trace Anyone offer a comprehensive and successful people finding service for the searching and tracing of missing people within Hong Kong, Europe and Internationally.
Finding Missing Persons in Hong Kong
It has been reported that the wife of one of the missing persons received consecutively two calls the displayed caller number being a Shenzhen phone number and a video footage from that missing person to assure her of his safety, and an associate of the bookstore received a handwritten fax from that missing person, disclosing that he had "returned to the Mainland using his own way to work with the authorities concerned in an investigation". Moreover, when commenting on the way through which that missing person entered the Mainland, the editorial of a mainland newspaper pointed out that "powerful agencies across the world generally have their own ways to circumvent the law and make a person under investigation work with them, so that they can proceed with their work without crossing the bottom line of the system". Also, a Member of this Council quoted a message from his friend saying that the five missing persons illegally entered the Mainland one after another to visit prostitutes and were arrested by public security authorities. Such remarks have sparked strong repercussions. The aforesaid cases have aroused concerns about whether the "one country, two systems" has been weakened, the way the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region SAR Government handles cases of Hong Kong residents reported missing, whether some persons have left Hong Kong by ways which circumvented the laws, whether mainland law enforcement officers have crossed the boundary to take law enforcement actions in Hong Kong, and whether the Government has assisted them in conducting investigations in Hong Kong.